Breaking News
Home » Hydrogen Fuel Production » GridShift Hydrogen Fuel at $2.51 per Gallon Breakthrough

GridShift Hydrogen Fuel at $2.51 per Gallon Breakthrough

There has been a press release circulating for the past couple of days by a company called GridShift Inc. that claims to have made an electrolysis breakthrough that will deliver compressed hydrogen fuel at around $2.51 per kilogram (equivalent to a gallon).

This press release has met with some skepticism from sources such as . But, I’m a little more optimistic after having a conversation with GridShift’s CEO Robert Dopp (pictured). According to Mr. Dopp, “My goal is to reach the 85-percent energy efficiency at 1 Amp/cm2 by this summer and then verification will begin. I am so far ahead of the field that comparative data will be hard to find.

“It is due to the coating technique I have developed which coats all surfaces of a 3D shape (like reticulate nickel foam) with nano catalysts in a way that is robust enough to withstand the rigors of electrolysis and still exposes the powders to the electrolyte’s boundary layer. None of the catalysts are Noble or expensive.”

Much of the technical details of how the new proprietary GridShift technology works in general can be found in a whitepaper on their website. According to the whitepaper, “We use no Noble metals in our work (i.e. no platinum). We then developed a novel way to adhere these powders to a metallic electrode surface … We have developed a unique method to attach nano catalysts to a metallic surface in a way that has very low impedance to the reaction sites, covers all surfaces of a porous structure and leaves the particles well exposed to the boundary layer.”

According to the GridShift press release, “GridShift’s uses a new catalyst comprised of readily available nano-particles, reducing catalyst costs by up to 97 percent. Platinum is the most often used catalyst for electrolysis based hydrogen generation, but at a cost of over $1700 an ounce, it becomes prohibitive at scale. This newly developed catalyst costs just $58 an ounce.

“Overall, GridShift’s new method for hydrogen generation produces four times more hydrogen per electrode surface area than what is currently reported for commercial units today. This means that an electrolysis unit using the GridShift method would produce at least four times more fuel in the same sized machine, or require a unit four times smaller than normal to make the same amount of hydrogen. GridShift’s new electrolysis method finally breaks down the barriers that have kept a truly green hydrogen highway from extending across the country.”

One of the problems that Bnet had with the $2.51 per gallon figure is that it was based upon five cents a kilowatt-hour when the national average is 12-cents. This may partly be true if the electrolysis device is to be used in hydrogen fueling stations during peak hours. But, at night during off-peak hours, when most home hydrogen fueling stations would be used (and presumably hydrogen fueling stations would also use this time to compress and store hydrogen as well) the 5 cent mark is about right. And this figure also becomes less if wind, solar or other alternative energy is used to provide the electrolysis.

In addition, Bnet states, “The average new auto struggles to reach 25 mpg, but hydrogen autos averaged 47 mpg in 2008 …” I’m not sure where they got this figure, but it is low compared to the data I have gathered, putting hydrogen autos more in the 60 mpge to 80 mpge range. Remember, that most hydrogen autos today are also hybrid vehicles and some are even plug-in hybrids.

Also, remember that if the $2.51 per gallon figure is correct and hydrogen autos get double the mileage as the average gasoline-powered automobile this would be the equivalent to around $1.75 per gallon of gasoline, a price we can all live with. The GridShift dual electrolyzer is pictured along with the laboratory it was conceived and tested in.

I’m optimistic that GridShift will truly provide, as the name implies, a shift in the paradigm from fossil fuels and uncontrollable offshore oil spills to cleaner, home grown alternative fuels of the future in just a few short years.

About Hydro Kevin Kantola

Hydro Kevin Kantola
I'm a hydrogen auto blogger, editor and publisher interested in documenting the history and the progression of hydrogen autos, vehicles and infrastructure worldwide.

Check Also

Glasgow Half Full in Hydrogen Production

Researchers at the University of Glasgow in Scotland (still part of the UK after the …


  1. Christina Bartley


    Okay! Let the market dictate which company wins the hydrogen lottery. No government interference.

    Will GridShift, Inc. have their method on the market soon at our friendly neighborhood gas stations? We can’t afford to have a home location for hydrogen; otherwise, I’d love it.

    Thanks for listening.

  2. I don’t know why everyone insists on using such convoluted calculations.

    First the cost of H2 is not a current obstacle. The GGE (gallon gas equivalent) is largely irrelevant and people should stop using it. What really matters for cost and range is much of an alternative fuel it takes to push the same auto the same distance as a gallon of gas, the fuel, the EGG (Effective Gallon of Gas equivalent) if you will.

    Based on a comparison of the Honda Civic with a normal gasoline engine and one with H2 fuel cells, the EGG of H2 used in a FCV is about 0.4 kg.

    So H2 at $4.50/kg is already cost competitive with gasoline at $1.80/EGG or even via electrolysis at $7/kg or $2.80/EGG.

    Instead, the real obstacle to cost competitive H2 vehicles (as the DOE status reports make clear) is the durability and cost of the fuel cells. If a fuel cell stack costs $15,000 and lasts only 75,000 miles, it’s not competitive with gasoline even if the H2 is free.

    That said, the ability to generate H2 via electrolysis so cheaply would be a HUGE breakthrough for a number of application. $2.50/kg = $1/EGG, so the fuel cost of an H2 vehicle would be less than half that of a normal gasoline engine. Still, color me very skeptical. If I had a dollar for every company that claimed to be able to produce $1/EGG alternative fuel…


  3. Why be stuck with fuel cell to power your autos, shift to electric vehicles using LIB.use Hydrogen to produce ecity.

  4. admin

    When battery electric vehicles can travel 300 miles on a single charge and recharge in 5 minutes, then I would say you have an argument. Until then, however, less is not always better.

Leave a Reply

Наш интересный веб портал , он рассказывает про дизайн дома.